LOW GHYLL

Dedicated area to show the community your model railway projects.
User avatar
RogerB
Posts: 1384
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 9:17 pm
Location: Dorset
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#391

Post by RogerB »

Of the two options I think the top one works best. I can see how the eye will miss it. How about an "A" framed pole but make the tip of the A very near the top of the upright. Admittedly there will be two rows of insulators. Just a thought. R-
Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts.
User avatar
Steve M
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Rochester, Kent
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#392

Post by Steve M »

Thanks Roger, I hadn't thought of that.

Actually that gives me another option - if I made a wire frame to mimic the shape of the the cross arms and the top section of the pole, I could mount it in the top of the angled part of the A post to carry the phone wires up to the board edge.

In my imagination I can see a 'ghost' of a pole top and arms. Small prongs to hold the wires and no insulators.

That's got me thinking.
"Not very stable, but incredibly versatile." ;)
User avatar
JohnSmithUK
Posts: 185
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 12:12 pm
Location: South Shields
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#393

Post by JohnSmithUK »

Steve M wrote: Thu Aug 08, 2019 1:07 pm Thanks Roger, I hadn't thought of that.

Actually that gives me another option - if I made a wire frame to mimic the shape of the the cross arms and the top section of the pole, I could mount it in the top of the angled part of the A post to carry the phone wires up to the board edge.

In my imagination I can see a 'ghost' of a pole top and arms. Small prongs to hold the wires and no insulators.

That's got me thinking.
Thinking is dangerous.
User avatar
Walkingthedog
Posts: 4977
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#394

Post by Walkingthedog »

I guess the first one is best. Still think having the wires across the join being repaired is best. They could be replacing a damaged pole, hit by a vehicle.
Nurse, the screens!
User avatar
RogerB
Posts: 1384
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 9:17 pm
Location: Dorset
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#395

Post by RogerB »

Steve M wrote: Thu Aug 08, 2019 1:07 pm .... if I made a wire frame to mimic the shape of the the cross arms .... I could mount it in the top of the angled part of the A
Even better. R-
Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts.
User avatar
Steve M
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Rochester, Kent
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#396

Post by Steve M »

A bit like this:

Image20190808_141259 by Steve Mumford, on Flickr

Not bad for a first try but I need to refine it a little, I think I may extend the main brass support straight down to the board so the ‘ghost’ section has two points of contact for rigidity.
"Not very stable, but incredibly versatile." ;)
User avatar
RogerB
Posts: 1384
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 9:17 pm
Location: Dorset
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#397

Post by RogerB »

Nearly perfect I’d say. R-
Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts.
User avatar
Steve M
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Rochester, Kent
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#398

Post by Steve M »

Slight design change - five pieces of brass but only two soldered joints and extended main shaft to give an extra mounting point on the board edge.
Three ‘ghost’ poles awaiting final painting.

Image20190809_120150 by Steve Mumford, on Flickr
"Not very stable, but incredibly versatile." ;)
User avatar
RogerB
Posts: 1384
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 9:17 pm
Location: Dorset
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#399

Post by RogerB »

I'm reminded of the Eirc & Ernie line - "it's very good - you can't see the join". R-
Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts.
User avatar
Walkingthedog
Posts: 4977
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#400

Post by Walkingthedog »

Blimey I started something when I mentioned the A poles. Won’t mention the H poles, blast I just did. :D
Nurse, the screens!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests