Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline

Help with designing your track work
Post Reply
User avatar
jamespetts
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:30 pm
Contact:

Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline

#1

Post by jamespetts »

A brief question for those familiar with Peco Streamline track (code 75) - is there much difference in running reliability between using a short Y (SL-E197) and the 3-way (SL-E199)? I generally try to avoid short radius points, even in fiddle yards, as I understand that these can be unreliable. However, I have also heard that 3-way points can be unreliable, too.

The intended application in this case is some fiddle yards. These fiddle yards are intended for use in an automated layout. The part of the fiddle yards in question will be dealing only with light engines. These will be steam engines - anything from a Lord Nelson to a P class.

Here is the relevant part of the fiddle yards using the short Y:

Image

And here is the equivalent part using the three way:

Image

The short Y has a radius of circa 610mm. The minimum radius curve on the layout is 600mm. The three way has a minimum radius of 980mm - the same as the medium radius turnouts. On minimum radius alone, the three way is preferable - but I have heard of this being unreliable in the sense of prompting more derailments than its simpler counterparts. Does anyone have experience of this such as might be able to advise which may be preferable in this situation?
Bandit Mick
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline

#2

Post by Bandit Mick »

Only just seen your post James - sorry. I have no experience of 3 ways but a mate of mine who is a very experienced modeller ( has worked with Pete Waterman and Roger Daltry) has had no end of trouble with them. I have used short Y points on two box files and they have run great - they were even insulfrog and my Pecketts (0-4-0s) had no problems running through them.
User avatar
Brian
Posts: 2214
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 3:49 pm
Location: SE Kent
Contact:

Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline

#3

Post by Brian »

From a user on a clubs DC layout, there is no problem with the Peco Three Way point, so long as speed is kept low. Which it is, as the point allows moves into and out of a storage set of sidings! :)
Image << Click the Icon to go to my website
User avatar
jamespetts
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:30 pm
Contact:

Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline

#4

Post by jamespetts »

Splendid, thank you both for your input.
User avatar
bulleidboy
Posts: 2309
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:30 pm
Location: Basingstoke, Hants
Contact:

Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline

#5

Post by bulleidboy »

I have two 3-way points at the entrance to the fiddle yard. They are operated by two DCC Concepts Cobalt point motors on each point. The intention was to have three but the track geometry and space only allowed for two. I have had no trouble with them - they are also fully ballasted.

ImageIMG_1219 by Barry Clayton, on Flickr
sandy
Posts: 619
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:05 pm
Location: Gretna Scotland
Contact:

Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline

#6

Post by sandy »

I use a Peco 3 way short point in my Loco yard and it works perfectly. oo gauge.
Sandy
User avatar
Walkingthedog
Posts: 4972
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
Contact:

Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline

#7

Post by Walkingthedog »

I had two Peco 3 way points, worked perfectly.
Nurse, the screens!
brian1951
Posts: 1273
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline

#8

Post by brian1951 »

Walkingthedog wrote: Fri May 06, 2022 8:09 am I had two Peco 3 way points, worked perfectly.
And they still do Brian. :lol:
User avatar
Walkingthedog
Posts: 4972
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
Contact:

Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline

#9

Post by Walkingthedog »

That’s good to know Brian.
Nurse, the screens!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests