Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline
- jamespetts
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:30 pm
- Contact:
Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline
A brief question for those familiar with Peco Streamline track (code 75) - is there much difference in running reliability between using a short Y (SL-E197) and the 3-way (SL-E199)? I generally try to avoid short radius points, even in fiddle yards, as I understand that these can be unreliable. However, I have also heard that 3-way points can be unreliable, too.
The intended application in this case is some fiddle yards. These fiddle yards are intended for use in an automated layout. The part of the fiddle yards in question will be dealing only with light engines. These will be steam engines - anything from a Lord Nelson to a P class.
Here is the relevant part of the fiddle yards using the short Y:
And here is the equivalent part using the three way:
The short Y has a radius of circa 610mm. The minimum radius curve on the layout is 600mm. The three way has a minimum radius of 980mm - the same as the medium radius turnouts. On minimum radius alone, the three way is preferable - but I have heard of this being unreliable in the sense of prompting more derailments than its simpler counterparts. Does anyone have experience of this such as might be able to advise which may be preferable in this situation?
The intended application in this case is some fiddle yards. These fiddle yards are intended for use in an automated layout. The part of the fiddle yards in question will be dealing only with light engines. These will be steam engines - anything from a Lord Nelson to a P class.
Here is the relevant part of the fiddle yards using the short Y:
And here is the equivalent part using the three way:
The short Y has a radius of circa 610mm. The minimum radius curve on the layout is 600mm. The three way has a minimum radius of 980mm - the same as the medium radius turnouts. On minimum radius alone, the three way is preferable - but I have heard of this being unreliable in the sense of prompting more derailments than its simpler counterparts. Does anyone have experience of this such as might be able to advise which may be preferable in this situation?
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 7:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline
Only just seen your post James - sorry. I have no experience of 3 ways but a mate of mine who is a very experienced modeller ( has worked with Pete Waterman and Roger Daltry) has had no end of trouble with them. I have used short Y points on two box files and they have run great - they were even insulfrog and my Pecketts (0-4-0s) had no problems running through them.
Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline
From a user on a clubs DC layout, there is no problem with the Peco Three Way point, so long as speed is kept low. Which it is, as the point allows moves into and out of a storage set of sidings!
- jamespetts
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:30 pm
- Contact:
- bulleidboy
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:30 pm
- Location: Basingstoke, Hants
- Contact:
Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline
I have two 3-way points at the entrance to the fiddle yard. They are operated by two DCC Concepts Cobalt point motors on each point. The intention was to have three but the track geometry and space only allowed for two. I have had no trouble with them - they are also fully ballasted.
IMG_1219 by Barry Clayton, on Flickr
IMG_1219 by Barry Clayton, on Flickr
Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline
I use a Peco 3 way short point in my Loco yard and it works perfectly. oo gauge.
Sandy
- Walkingthedog
- Posts: 4972
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
- Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
- Contact:
Re: Short Y vs three way? Peco Streamline
I had two Peco 3 way points, worked perfectly.
Nurse, the screens!
- Walkingthedog
- Posts: 4972
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
- Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests