Page 2 of 3
Re: tenders
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 11:49 am
by eddcase1
definately an 8f ,i had never seen one before so i climbed all over it, until the bloke turned up and told me all about it
Re: tenders
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:29 pm
by Walkingthedog
Was it a GWR or LMS 2-8-0.
Re: tenders
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:46 pm
by eddcase1
gwr 8437 and 8469 were 8f
your pic is a 28xx ,no 5vboiler looks quite different
Re: tenders
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:54 pm
by Walkingthedog
I thought the 84xx locos were pannier tanks of the 94xx class.
Re: tenders
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:02 pm
by eddcase1
Re: tenders
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:04 pm
by Walkingthedog
Sorry thought you were referring to GWR as you mentioned Collet tenders.
My second picture is an LMS 8F with a Fowler tender.
Re: tenders
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:34 pm
by footplate1947
So did I Brian........I'm confused ....Never mind I though I would add to my input earlier. About the LMS locos ending up far away as Neath and other Places. The chap who told me that, who worked for GWR during the war was probably quite right. During the war days I expect that many locos ended up in all sorts of places they would not normally have gone to. It was not normal times you know...............Just to say I prefer the look of the GWR 28xx rather than the LMS 8F but thy are both nice coal dragger's. ........John
Re: tenders
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:02 pm
by footplate1947
Just to add some thing about LMS locos not going further south than Abergavenny. That cannot be true as the LMS run down through Bath all the way down to Bournemouth. .....John
Re: tenders
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 5:23 pm
by eddcase1
through gloucester
Re: tenders
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 6:01 pm
by footplate1947
I said it ran via Bath down to Bournemouth and followed from the boarder line to the north. I don't think it would be able to do that if it did not go through Hereford / Gloucester could it. Did you sort out your Tender question. John