Page 3 of 6
Re: As yet un-named
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2020 9:32 pm
by davidrivett
Re: As yet un-named
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:18 pm
by Mountain Goat
Very effective use of low relief.
Re: As yet un-named
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:13 pm
by davidrivett
Some views of my attempts at scenery using scratch built materials.
Banksides including the ramp up to the overbridge are made of polystyrene sheets left over when insulating the room and plaster cloth on the main lengthy one. Painted then grassed using static applicator.
Flats are all packing materials from work such as bent cardboard strips used to protect products.
Brick support walls are painted pre set ones from on line.
Still a lot to make it effective but pleased with the outcome so far, certainly makes a flat train set spring into life!
Thanks
David
Re: As yet un-named
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:58 pm
by Steve M
Re: As yet un-named
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2020 6:53 am
by RogerB
Very good. The bank is particularly effective. R-
Re: As yet un-named
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:36 pm
by davidrivett
Re: As yet un-named
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2022 9:45 am
by Mountain Goat
Looks good.
I went through the stage of altering things again and again on my last layout and I enjoyed the thought process of doing so.
My thoughts in the past were along the lines of "I wonder if I can get another track in there" or "If I move this track, it can be made to join to that one"...
Today, after having worked on the railways for a few years and looking at layouts that capture the character of the real railways (Regardless if they are fictional settings or not), there is a fine art to not cramming too much in, but on the same side, not to make it look too sparce and void of detail either (Which can happen if one does a direct copy of the real thing).
Make room for signals, roads and lineside equipment, and of course, scenery!
Some other thoughts. I went on a big spend in the past in trying to first get one example of each class of loco seen down here in the time period, but then I looked at ratios of loco classes seen and tried to get many 37's, 47's and DMU's etc...
But at the end of the day, in reality (If one is modelling "Further down the line but not quite a branch line status" rather than a city junction through route), one will find the same loco numbers turning up again and again as they will be not only allocated to a certain depot, but the same locos will go on a pre-determined rota where they run for the day on maybe back and fore on the one job, or do several jobs eventually coming back in a loop a few days later with a minor checkover and refuel at the depot as part of the loop.
Therefore in reality one does not need to get one of each loco seen in books as some books emphasise a loco which only ever did the one trip and was never seen again! Most areas of the network saw the same "Group" of units going back and fore again and again even though this may be made out of a few different classes of loco, there were not many in reality as traincrew needed training and to be kept up to date on the units they were trained to work.
Re: As yet un-named
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2022 5:51 am
by Chops
Enjoying the low relief and the modern range. The track plan is most engaging. Does it have a name yet? I named mine Henley simply because of fond memories of a year spent there back in '66. Fact is, never got Britain out of my system.
Re: As yet un-named
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2022 7:10 pm
by davidrivett
Thanks for the comments.
Still no name decided, but plenty of time to think about one!
Think HS2 will be done before me tbh....
Re: As yet un-named
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2022 7:40 pm
by davidrivett