Alternative point motor wiring
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2021 5:20 pm
I'm currently looking at the electrical arrangements for the small OO layout which I'm currently building, specifically in relation to point control. Due to space constraints I'm using Setrack points (so insulfrog) and I'm using Peco PL-11 solenoid point motors of (surface mount type - because I have them already from a previous layout).
I'm aware of the conventional method of wiring solenoid point motors, using a 16V AC supply, a CDU, and either passing contact switches or 'stud and probe' arrangement. However when putting together another layout about 10 years ago I came across the attached circuit which uses standard on-on single pole toggle switches instead. I really like it because the toggle switches give a visual indication of the lie of each point, as with a passing contact switch, but at much lower cost. If you use 2-pole switches, the other pole of the switch can be used for polarity switching if using electrofrog points, or (as I'm considering doing on my new layout) to provide a switched feed to the sidings accessed by each point, thus supplementing the connection which is otherwise only provided by the point blade touching the stock-rail. Another possibility would be to use the second pole to switch a remote indicator light, or a simple colour-light signal, or even as an input into a more complex signal interlocking system.
As I say I came across this circuit a decade or so ago and went with it... and it worked really well, but I've ended up having to reverse engineer the control modules I built back then to remind myself how it worked, because it doesn't seem to be a well known method. Does anyone else use it? Are there issues with it which I may not have noticed, which others have found from experience? The only very minor downside which I'm aware of is that because the capacitors only charge with each switch in one direction, it is necessary to switch each point back and forth when first powering on to get them all charged up. But after that, they will all operate correctly. It seems a nice elegant system and I like it. Just checking I'm not missing anythink horrible before I commit to it!
Edit - frustratingly it doesn't seem to want to display the image - I shall endeavour to attach it somehow! Further edit - should be viewable on the link below...
https://1drv.ms/u/s!Al0KteWl_OU5gqhlaNU ... A?e=U0Fuh3
I'm aware of the conventional method of wiring solenoid point motors, using a 16V AC supply, a CDU, and either passing contact switches or 'stud and probe' arrangement. However when putting together another layout about 10 years ago I came across the attached circuit which uses standard on-on single pole toggle switches instead. I really like it because the toggle switches give a visual indication of the lie of each point, as with a passing contact switch, but at much lower cost. If you use 2-pole switches, the other pole of the switch can be used for polarity switching if using electrofrog points, or (as I'm considering doing on my new layout) to provide a switched feed to the sidings accessed by each point, thus supplementing the connection which is otherwise only provided by the point blade touching the stock-rail. Another possibility would be to use the second pole to switch a remote indicator light, or a simple colour-light signal, or even as an input into a more complex signal interlocking system.
As I say I came across this circuit a decade or so ago and went with it... and it worked really well, but I've ended up having to reverse engineer the control modules I built back then to remind myself how it worked, because it doesn't seem to be a well known method. Does anyone else use it? Are there issues with it which I may not have noticed, which others have found from experience? The only very minor downside which I'm aware of is that because the capacitors only charge with each switch in one direction, it is necessary to switch each point back and forth when first powering on to get them all charged up. But after that, they will all operate correctly. It seems a nice elegant system and I like it. Just checking I'm not missing anythink horrible before I commit to it!
Edit - frustratingly it doesn't seem to want to display the image - I shall endeavour to attach it somehow! Further edit - should be viewable on the link below...
https://1drv.ms/u/s!Al0KteWl_OU5gqhlaNU ... A?e=U0Fuh3