New layout

Help with designing your track work
Nine Elms
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2020 7:01 pm
Contact:

New layout

#1

Post by Nine Elms »

New layout.jpg
Afternoon All.

I am planning a new layout and am appealing to you learned people for some guidance. I have used SCARM to put some ideas on paper and this is what I have so far. It is on a 00 gauge on a 2500 x 1500 baseboard and would like some thoughts and criticisms as to the feasibility of the plan.

Please don't hold back as I would rather know now, before buying track etc., and not after I have started!!
Thank you
John
User avatar
Brian
Posts: 2214
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 3:49 pm
Location: SE Kent
Contact:

Re: New layout

#2

Post by Brian »

Hi
You may find the incline to the overhead section is too short? In OO a 1 in 30 rise is about the minimum recommended. Thats for every 1 unit of rise you need 30 identical units of length (A "Unit" is the measurement in mm. CM or inches etc) Add curves into the rise and you will need a shallower rise as curves add drag.
To give clearance in OO you will need 60mm from the lower level rail top to the underside of anything passing over the lower tracks. Note the measurement is taken from the lower tracks rail top not the baseboard.

Have you given thought to how all tracks can be accessed for rail cleaning and correcting any derailments etc. especially the area at the rear?
Image << Click the Icon to go to my website
Nine Elms
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2020 7:01 pm
Contact:

Re: New layout

#3

Post by Nine Elms »

Thank you for your comments, Brian. I will look again at the design and maybe do away with the incline. As to the "track cleaning/derailment" the intended resting place for the baseboard will allow access all round.
Back to SCARM!!!
Regards
John
bnb
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2018 8:13 pm
Contact:

Re: New layout

#4

Post by bnb »

If the main layout was at a height of 35mm off the baseboard, the incline would then climb 30mm and the track to the sidings (fiddle yard would drop 35mm giving a 65mm clearance at the bridge. The grades would not be excessive.
User avatar
yelrow
Posts: 954
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:54 pm
Location: Burgundy, France
Contact:

Re: New layout

#5

Post by yelrow »

you need a heck of a lot of layout these days with new underpowered locos, to make them climb. i have 2 helix all at specified heights. modern locos struggle, older diesels shoot up.
User avatar
Walkingthedog
Posts: 4972
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
Contact:

Re: New layout

#6

Post by Walkingthedog »

John where would the gradient start and finish?
Nurse, the screens!
User avatar
yelrow
Posts: 954
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:54 pm
Location: Burgundy, France
Contact:

Re: New layout

#7

Post by yelrow »

Hi Brian, mine rise 14.6 inches, as I cut previous one in half, that was 29 inches high. They rise 4 circuits high, and are joined by 4 foot long bridge, each helix, 4 foot diameter.. they go corner to corner across layout, and have double tracks.
User avatar
Walkingthedog
Posts: 4972
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
Contact:

Re: New layout

#8

Post by Walkingthedog »

Sorry John I was asking the other John (Nine Elms).
Nurse, the screens!
User avatar
yelrow
Posts: 954
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:54 pm
Location: Burgundy, France
Contact:

Re: New layout

#9

Post by yelrow »

Just saying.
User avatar
Walkingthedog
Posts: 4972
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
Contact:

Re: New layout

#10

Post by Walkingthedog »

The helix is the way to go John, but two of them, that’s real class.
Nurse, the screens!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest