They could have built in a bluetooth feedback circuit into the PSU and made a complete system.
At £60 that would not have been beyond reasonable to expect.
This is ill thought out on all aspects of system safety and functionality.
A current measuring facility would meet both requirements.
In your car analogy, it is like a reversing system without a camera !
You drive blind and that is what users are doing with HM7000
H&M 7000 DCC by Bluetooth
Re: H&M 7000 DCC by Bluetooth
The vast majority of cars don't have reversing cameras - drivers look over their shoulders when going backwards rather than driving blind.
With HM7K the recommendation, which is absolutely clear in the instructions, is to use a Hornby designated PSU or an existing DCC system to supply power - all of which have the necessary protections built in. Or you could ignore the advice and take your chances. It's the user's decision and their responsibility should a non-recommended PSU be used and result in damage.
Hornby should be applauded for developing a system that has the potential to take DCC to a new and affordable level, not endlessly criticised.
With HM7K the recommendation, which is absolutely clear in the instructions, is to use a Hornby designated PSU or an existing DCC system to supply power - all of which have the necessary protections built in. Or you could ignore the advice and take your chances. It's the user's decision and their responsibility should a non-recommended PSU be used and result in damage.
Hornby should be applauded for developing a system that has the potential to take DCC to a new and affordable level, not endlessly criticised.
"Not very stable, but incredibly versatile."
Re: H&M 7000 DCC by Bluetooth
Before this thread descends into the sort of conversation we see elsewhere, and on the basis that both sides of the conversation have had their say, this thread is now locked. R-
Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests