LOW GHYLL

Dedicated area to show the community your model railway projects.
User avatar
Brian
Posts: 2194
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 3:49 pm
Location: SE Kent
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#591

Post by Brian »

Lovely work Steve ;)
Dont think I would have liked to climb up to the top though. Just my luck to have done so and found the needed left handed widget turning spanner is still in the depot :lol:
Image << Click the Icon to go to my website
User avatar
Steve M
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Rochester, Kent
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#592

Post by Steve M »

That’s it, Shaddeholme has left the building.
This weekend I found out just what a cr@ppy job I did when I built the baseboards - all sorts of odd offcuts making dismantling a bit of a challenge. I have saved the harbour and the main station but I had to take a sabresaw to the engine yard.

The next job, before I start on the new layout, is to build a new support frame for Low Ghyll to keep it straight and level. I intend to build this from plywood I beams with similar cross bracing that actually matches up with the shelf supports. The frame will be a permanent structure while the modular baseboards will ‘float’ on top. It will also serve as a trial run as I intend to use the same method on the new layout, just a bit bigger and hopefully stronger.

Image2021-03-07_02-04-10 by Steve Mumford, on Flickr
"Not very stable, but incredibly versatile." ;)
User avatar
bulleidboy
Posts: 2299
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:30 pm
Location: Basingstoke, Hants
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#593

Post by bulleidboy »

This is going to be something to look forward to - can't wait :)
User avatar
Chops
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 8:11 am
Location: El Paso, Texas USA
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#594

Post by Chops »

Remarkable architecture, but it must be a special misery to have to disassemble so much work. None the less, it is a good thing that Low Ghyll shall continue forward. :)
User avatar
Steve M
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Rochester, Kent
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#595

Post by Steve M »

Strangely enough Chops it was no issue at all - yes there are a couple of (very) small sections that I will keep but as a whole I just wasn’t feeling the love for the layout any more. Apart from my aching joints this morning, it didn’t hurt at all.

Low Ghyll is pretty much finished so this is an ideal opportunity to put it on a firm and level foundation while I have the room to do it. The problem I created with the layout was that the support frame had to be extended as the layout grew the result being that it always ran out of true which did cause a few running issues across the board joints. They were originally lined up on a level workbench but were able to flex slightly on the frame. And I was, perhaps not as fastidious as I should have been when I created the through holes to bolt the sections together.

Hopefully I will get this aspect right with the new layout. I have a name - ‘West Orton’ - but as usual I’m lost with a trackplan. I don’t even know if there will be a station or not. I am aiming for a valley and bridge on one of the short boards at the end of the shed and I will be trying to avoid the ‘flat earth’ look. Apart from that I haven’t a clue.
"Not very stable, but incredibly versatile." ;)
User avatar
Steve M
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Rochester, Kent
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#596

Post by Steve M »

Spent the day on two tasks; the first was to see what, if anything was worth saving from the old layout. I ended up cutting out the harbour scene, with a short loop of rail which could in time be resurrected as a small shunting diorama.
I also sliced the main station board along the line of the double track mainline to save a narrow space for track and the canal scene, which looks better viewed from the other side. I’ve also saved the helix (probably to be sold) and a traversed which may find its way onto the new layout.
Then this afternoon I transformed an 8x4 sheet of ply into nine 64mm I beams - they seem to be quite strong and stable but I suspect I shall use a different method for the new layout.
"Not very stable, but incredibly versatile." ;)
User avatar
Steve M
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Rochester, Kent
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#597

Post by Steve M »

Nearly there with the new support frame - it’s strong, so much so that the weakest link is now the shelf brackets themselves.
I just have the fiddly bit near the door to finish off then a light sanding and a coat of paint. I have tried to place the stretchers between the outer rails at the board joints which should help with access to the joining bolts and the underboard electrics.
The frame will also provide a solid base for new lighting for the layout to be built at the lower level.

Image2021-03-09_01-02-58 by Steve Mumford, on Flickr

Image2021-03-09_01-03-11 by Steve Mumford, on Flickr
"Not very stable, but incredibly versatile." ;)
User avatar
RogerB
Posts: 1379
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 9:17 pm
Location: Dorset
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#598

Post by RogerB »

Very neat. Too neat. It’s just not fair. R-
Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts.
User avatar
Walkingthedog
Posts: 4953
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#599

Post by Walkingthedog »

Roger we could go over and sabotage it.
Nurse, the screens!
User avatar
Steve M
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Rochester, Kent
Contact:

Re: LOW GHYLL

#600

Post by Steve M »

Walkingthedog wrote: Tue Mar 09, 2021 3:02 pm Roger we could go over and sabotage it.
I’ll put the kettle on. :D
"Not very stable, but incredibly versatile." ;)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests